What is a con of having a monarchy?

Having a monarchy often means that the royal family is funded by taxpayers, which can be viewed as a significant downside. This arrangement implies that the public bears the financial burden of maintaining the monarchy, which can lead to discontent, particularly if citizens believe that the funds could be better utilized for public services or other priorities. This funding can create a sense of inequality as the wealth of the royal family contrasts with the financial struggles of ordinary taxpayers.

In many democratic societies, there is also an ongoing debate about the justification for such financial support. If the monarchy is not seen as serving a necessary or beneficial function for the state, public opinion may turn critical, especially during economic downturns when taxpayers are faced with their own financial constraints. This could spark discussions about the monarchy's relevance and sustainability in the modern era.

The other options reflect perceived benefits of monarchy; providing continuity, maintaining political objectivity, and ensuring independence from political processes highlight advantages rather than drawbacks, which is what makes the funding by taxpayers a con in this context.