What must happen if the council votes to exclude the press and public from a meeting?

A majority vote is required to proceed with the exclusion of the press and public from a council meeting in order to maintain transparency and democratic processes. Such a vote allows council members to collectively decide on the necessity of confidentiality for specific discussions while still adhering to principles of accountability. This process ensures that the decision to exclude is not arbitrary and reflects the views of a majority, rather than allowing a few individuals to make unilateral decisions about transparency.

In contrast, unanimous agreement would require all council members to agree, which might be impractical and could hinder the council's ability to carry out its duties. Holding meetings entirely in private thereafter would undermine the principle of open governance and would not be appropriate as councils are expected to operate transparently unless there are valid reasons for confidentiality. Lastly, requiring the press to leave immediately without explanation would not respect journalistic standards or the public's right to know, as it would provide no context or rationale for the exclusion.