Which of the following is a disadvantage of an unwritten constitution?

An unwritten constitution refers to a legal framework that is not codified in a single document but instead consists of statutes, legal conventions, and practices developed over time. One of the primary disadvantages of such a system is that it leads to ambiguity and uncertainty. Unlike a written constitution that clearly delineates rights, powers, and procedures, an unwritten constitution may lack clarity on various governmental processes and citizens' rights. This can result in different interpretations over time or in differing legal contexts, leading to confusion regarding the authority and limits of government and the entitlements of individuals.

Such ambiguity makes it challenging for both citizens and officials to know the rules governing their actions and rights fully. It can result in inconsistencies in legal decisions, as various courts or institutions may interpret the unwritten rules differently. This uncertainty might hinder effective governance and create difficulties for citizens seeking to understand their rights or pursue legal remedies. Overall, while unwritten constitutions can be flexible and adaptive, the disadvantage of ambiguity poses significant challenges for maintaining a clear and stable legal framework.